1) Does "Who Cares Scotland" see a role for their organisation in providing an integrated service for Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors in Scotland?

2) Do "Who Care Scotland" want to be a part of providing and delivering a service to Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors in Scotland?

3) Are "Who Cares Scotland" happy and committed to taking on such a role in providing an integrated service to Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors which is sustainable and fully funded from the outset (ring fence funding)?

4) Does "Who Cares Scotland" consider our proposals/discussion document submitted by FBGA a good basis for discussion in providing an integrated service with health and social components to all Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors?

5) Does "Who Cares Scotland" have any concerns with the FBGA approach, structure and possible remit being proposed by FBGA in providing a fully integrated service for all Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors in Scotland?

6) Does "Who Cares Scotland" see any barriers or obstacles to what FBGA is proposing?

7) What does "Who Cares Scotland" have to address or undertake internally or externally with regards its own organisation to enable it to take on such an expanding role in providing a service to Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors in the future?

8) Are there any Areas of Conflict?

9) Are there any resource issues?

10) Does "Who Care Scotland" consider it appropriate to include other parties involved in the proposals/discussions? (Aside from the subgroup). Would they like to see anyone else involved in the discussions/proposals?

11) How do "Who Cares Scotland" envisage there current role/remit fitting in with there expanded role in the future in providing a service for Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors?

12) What plans do "Who Care Scotland" have to include Adult Survivors and Survivor group representatives going forward and in the future?

13) What model of service to Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors do "Who Care Scotland" see as being sustainable and deliverable in future consistent with the needs of all vulnerable Adult Institutional Abuse Survivors in Scotland?

14) Are any components missing in the discussion document or models being proposed by FBGA? Is there anything "Who Cares Scotland" would add or subtract?

15) Are there any weaknesses or gaps in the proposals being put forward by FBGA?

16)What if any do they see as Risks in adopting the approach, structure and remit being proposed by FBGA?

17) What do they see as the main benefits of our proposed approach, structure remit?

18) Do "Who Cares Scotland" have anything to add or propose?

FBGA